27. Conclusions

No Comments

Length: {27:52 minutes}

The conclusion of the video emphasizes the enduring influence and control exerted by central banks and large commercial banks, despite changes in individual leadership over the centuries. It argues that focusing on specific families or individuals is less productive than addressing the systemic issues of a corrupt banking system. The narrative underscores that central banks, such as the Bank of England and the Bank of France, have become entrenched over centuries and are now safeguarded by laws, political influence, and media control.

Furthermore, the conclusion criticizes the notion that changes in leadership or the political spectrum (left vs. right ideologies) will resolve the fundamental economic issues caused by the concentration of wealth into fewer hands. It dismisses the political left and right as manipulated by the banking system to ensure their continued influence, regardless of who holds political power.

In essence, the conclusion advocates for monetary reform as the most critical political issue, suggesting that the current debt-based monetary system, controlled primarily by private bankers through mechanisms like fractional reserve banking, perpetuates economic instability and inequality. It proposes a solution akin to issuing debt-free US notes to retire national debt gradually while adjusting reserve requirements to stabilize the money supply and avoid inflation.

“Despite these challenges, there remains hope for reform. Initiatives like those proposed by the Sovereignty movement advocate for issuing debt-free US notes to finance public projects, a concept similar to the successful model of Guernsey in the English Channel. Guernsey’s use of debt-free paper money since 1815 to fund infrastructure projects serves as a testament to the viability of such systems.

However, reform faces significant opposition from international banking entities, which historically resist any challenge to their control over global economies. The fractional reserve banking system, criticized for its role in inflation and economic instability, continues to be a major concern. Advocates for change argue that such reforms are not only necessary but constitutionally authorized, highlighting the role of Congress in managing monetary policy and reforming banking laws.

In the face of potential economic upheaval, some foresee the need for a crisis to spur acceptance of a ‘New World Order,’ a sentiment echoed by figures like David Rockefeller. Yet, proponents of reform stress that delaying action risks irreversible damage to the nation’s economic sovereignty and the erosion of the middle class.

In conclusion, the call to reform the monetary system and challenge the dominance of international bankers remains urgent and contentious. Whether through issuing debt-free money or abolishing fractional reserve banking, proponents argue that the benefits outweigh the risks of maintaining the status quo. The path forward requires courage and steadfastness against entrenched interests, echoing historical warnings and advocating for a more equitable economic future.”

This summary encapsulates the key points and arguments presented in the transcript regarding monetary reform and the challenges posed by the current banking system.

The embedded video will merely start at the right time;
but the videos in the index below will also end correctly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *